As the coronavirus pandemic has forced nations around the world to go into lockdown, Germany and South Korea have made headlines for their early responses to the crisis. In each country, officials moved swiftly to implement widespread testing and contact-tracing programs to identify individuals who had contracted the virus.
Those actions have helped both countries avoid the high death tolls that others have suffered. While there have been 150,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in Germany, to date just over 5,000 people have died, according to researchers at . By comparison, neighboring France has a similar number of confirmed cases, but over four times as many deaths. South Korea, meanwhile, has recorded nearly 11,000 cases, but only 240 deaths.
Now, the two nations are beginning to contemplate what life looks like after the immediate crisis has passed. and started to reopen in some parts of Germany this week, and the country has launched Europe’s first large-scale study — the results of which could shed light on how deadly the virus truly is, and whether people develop some form of immunity, information that could prove crucial to any long-term exit strategy. Initial results are .
Last week, millions of South Koreans wearing masks and disposable gloves, and standing a safe distance apart, to vote in national assembly elections — something that seems almost inconceivable in countries where residents remain under strict lockdown.
“We were very nervous. We believed that it could develop into a pandemic,” Lee Sang-won, an expert on infectious diseases at the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told Reuters, about the country’s swift moves to develop a coronavirus test. “We acted like an army.”
South Korean health officials identified the country’s . Within days, they called a meeting with representatives from more than 20 medical companies, and . Currently there are 613 testing centers across Korea, including 71 drive-thru sites.
Germany moved quickly as well. A team of researchers at Berlin’s Charité hospital developed in mid-January. It was then rolled out to labs at universities, hospitals, government agencies and private firms across the country.
“We have a culture here in Germany that is actually not supporting a centralized diagnostic system,” Christian Drosten, the leader of the Charité hospital team, . “So Germany does not have a public health laboratory that would restrict other labs from doing the tests. So we had an open market from the beginning.”
That system allowed Germany to scale up its testing capacity quickly. “By the beginning or middle of February, testing was already in place, broadly,” Drosten said.
Officials in other countries have looked to Germany and South Korea’s testing prowess with envy.
“We all know that Germany got ahead in terms of its ability to do testing for the virus, and there’s a lot to learn from that,” Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, earlier this month.
The U.K. is working to ramp up its testing capacity, with the of being able to conduct , but it is likely to of that target.
The U.K. initially adopted a centralized approach to testing using government labs, before involving smaller private labs across the country. Scientists have criticized the government for failing to enlist smaller labs earlier on, saying that
In the United States, which recorded its first positive case of the coronavirus in January, on the same day that South Korea did, testing has also lagged behind. The initial test kits developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , and labs across the country , severely delaying the U.S. response to the crisis.
“The idea of anybody getting [tested] easily the way people in other countries are doing it, we’re not set up for that,” Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told a congressional committee last month. “That is a failing. Let’s admit it.”
More comprehensive testing early on in the pandemic might have allowed countries to avoid imposing paralyzing restrictions on social and economic activity. South Korea’s aggressive testing and contact-tracing program, for example, helped it .
Having failed to control the spread of the coronavirus in the pandemic’s early days, however, officials in other countries have acknowledged that increased testing is a key condition for reopening society.
“This is how we will defeat COVID-19 in the end,” U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson .
Mass community testing “is part of the strategy,” U.K. health secretary Matt Hancock . “We will be introducing it when we can.”
Researchers at Harvard University recently estimated that over the next month in order for the country to reopen safely.
Even as countries are working to increase their diagnostic testing capacity, many are following Germany’s lead by conducting antibody tests, in the hopes that these studies will help chart a path out of the crisis.
Boris Johnson has hailed antibody tests as a potential in the battle against the coronavirus. This week, to track the spread of the virus in the country and test whether previously infected people have developed antibodies. Around 1,000 people will have blood samples taken every month to test for antibodies.
In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration earlier this month, and this week, involving 3,000 people.
“Any plan to start to reopen the economy has to be based on data and testing, and we have to make sure our antibody and diagnostic testing is up to the scale we need so we can safely get people back to work,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said in a , citing Germany’s own antibody testing study.
New York’s antibody testing would be done “in the most aggressive way in the nation,” Cuomo said.
“This will be the first true snapshot of exactly how many people were infected by COVID-19 and where we are as a population, and will help us to reopen and rebuild without jeopardizing what we’ve already accomplished.”
It is believed that people who have recovered from COVID-19 are likely to have developed some degree of immunity to it, but scientists remain uncertain about how widespread infections have been, how much protection antibodies may confer, and how long any immunity might last.
“There are a lot of countries that are suggesting using rapid diagnostic serological tests to be able to capture what they think will be a measure of immunity,” Maria Van Kerkhove, an American infectious diseases expert who is the World Health Organization’s technical lead on COVID-19, . “Right now, we have no evidence that the use of a serological test can show that an individual has immunity or is protected from reinfection.”
With reporting from HuffPost Korea and HuffPost UK.
- Stay up to date with our live blog as we cover the COVID-19 pandemic
- What happens if we end social distancing too soon?
- What you need to know about face masks right now
- How long are asymptomatic carriers contagious?
- Lost your job due to coronavirus? Here’s what you need to know.
- Everything you need to know about coronavirus and grief
- Parenting during the coronavirus crisis?
- The HuffPost guide to working from 河北11选5遗漏
- What coronavirus questions are on your mind right now? We want to help you find answers.
Everyone deserves accurate information about COVID-19. Support journalism without a paywall — and keep it free for everyone — by becoming a HuffPost member today.